Davarian Baldwin describes the New Negro as a person who uses the "mass consumer marketplace as a crucial site of intellectual life" (Baldwin, 5). Baldwin considers Chicago as the haven for the New Negro, where black entrepreneurship thrives and strides towards racial uplift are derived. Chicago is a blossoming economic powerhouse, that fostered motivation for blacks to begin a collective movement towards excellency through the competitive racial narrative. The New Negro becomes inspired by the possibilities of success, and create an entrepreneurial culture in Chicago, where black businesses sprung up and provided black communities with commerce and economic power. New Negroes built self-sustaining businesses in Chicago, where the disposable incomes of other black people were invested in the separate black economy. "The overt desire for autonomous black cultural production through economic control, and specifically though consumer strategies, was arguably the most salient aspect of Chicago's New Negro consciousness" (7). Baldwin's emphasis on the entrepreneurial impact of the New Negro moves towards the idea of being autonomous from the rest of society, and use the marketplace as the means to get there. All types of people in the metropolis known as Chicago, varying from entrepreneurs to war veterans to laborers felt connected to the "symbiotic relationship between black producers and black consumers" (7).
Alain Locke's understanding of the New Negro is reactionary to Davarian Baldwin's. The works of art produced by Locke's New Negroes in Harlem responded to the prior sentiment that blacks were inferior to whites. The New Negro, according to Locke, created a literature, drama, and art for self determination, and freed themselves through the works they created. Instead of starting businesses like Baldwin's New Negroes in Chicago, the New Negroes in Harlem expressed the transformations and changes in the black spirit through artistic compositions. Locke emphasizes the intellectual competency of the artist, and their involvement in the Harlem Renaissance, which uplifted the New Negro in the artistic revolution. The artists were considered elite, and did not include the same kind of working people in Chicago; however, they reflected the same general ideology as their counterparts.
Through the artistic contributions of the New Negro in Harlem, black people could feel like they were elevating their place in society, and could indulge in the self respect and pride they always deserved. In Chicago, black people could engage in the same kind of self love through entrepreneurism and the independence they gain through making a separate, black marketplace. Although the class level and location differs between Locke and Baldwin's New Negroes, the core of their movement and transformation was consistent. Both worked towards creating a new and improved space for blacks, to feel self worth in a world that was constantly teaching them otherwise.
I agree that there was definitely a class element within the differences of the New Negro according to Locke and the New Negro according to Baldwin. I found Chicago New Negroes by Baldwin very interesting. As he stated in his introduction discussions and scholarship about the New Negro tend to focus on the Negro artist as the vantage point. I myself, am guilty of the same association with the Harlem Renaissance and the emergence of the New Negro consciousness. However, Baldwin's interpretation offers a nuanced understanding of the New Negro that is not limited to just the artist and/or the intellectual. It examines the people out the ground level. It also provides a sense of agency that is not limited to the intellectual or the artist but others that did fit into that particular narrative. All in all, I appreciated a different perspective of the New Negro.
ReplyDelete